The moon may have originated from material pushed from Earth during a
planetary collision, according to gases trapped in lunar meteorites.
ABOUT 4.5 BILLION YEARS AGO, a molten lava-covered primitive Earth circled
the sun. It had only just begun to exist when it was violently impacted by
Theia, a smaller object of Mars' size. The crash destroyed Theia and sent a
sizable portion of Earth hurtling into space.
This debris whirled around Earth due to the planet's remaining mass's
gravitational attraction. Some of the debris stayed together and produced
the moon in a shockingly little period of time—possibly less than 100
years.
At least, this is how one well-liked hypothesis about the creation of the
moon goes. However, there is new evidence that points to the possibility
that the moon was really formed from the ruins of this cosmic collision
billions of years ago. The notion is supported by the finding of certain
gases inside the moon, which also provides us with crucial new information
about how it may have occurred.
Patrizia Will researched six lunar meteorites that NASA had brought back
from Antarctica in the early 2000s while pursuing her PhD at the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich. She and her coworkers
discovered helium and neon trapped in microscopic glass beads in these
rocks, which were created in volcanic eruptions on the lunar surface when
magma was drawn up from the moon's core. These gases, which are referred to
as noble gases because they are generally non-reactive, appear to have come
from Earth and were probably passed on to the moon "during its development,"
according to Will. Science Advances, a publication, published the
study.
The huge impact theory has been mentioned in earlier research. The
extraordinary resemblance between Earth rocks and lunar rocks points to a
shared origin. But there are important distinctions: For instance, lunar
rocks contain a lighter form of chlorine, indicating a cataclysmic event
that separated some material early in the histories of our two
planets.
Now, most scientists concur that this was a massive collision. Sujoy
Mukhopadhyay, a geochemist at the University of California, Davis who was
not part in Will's work, states, "We are quite set on the massive impact
idea. The most promising theory is still the one.
After the collision, a disk of material that had been moved by it may have
formed around our planet. This disk may have included a donut-shaped chunk
of rock that had been vaporized and reached temperatures of thousands of
degrees, known as a synestia. The relative abundance of these gases suggests
they originated from Earth's mantle and were launched into space by the
impact before being fused into the interior of our satellite. The quantity
of neon and helium found in the lunar samples also supports the idea that
the moon formed in this synestia. We would anticipate that the
concentrations of these gases in the meteorites under study would be far
smaller if they had instead been carried onto the moon by solar winds from
across space.
No previous research has been able to detect evidence for such indigenous
gases in lunar rocks, therefore Mukhopadhyay calls it "very exciting work."
Ray Burgess, a geochemist from the University of Manchester and a reviewer
of Will's research, claims that the quantities are extremely low and hence
very difficult to detect. It's a significant improvement.
The Noble Gas Laboratory at ETH Zurich is home to a cutting-edge mass
spectrometer that can identify the components of a chemical compound by
weighing each of its constituent molecules. Will and her team used this
device to make the finding. Will claims that the ETH Zurich equipment "has
the highest sensitivity for researching helium and neon" in the whole globe.
By using a small pair of tweezers to remove the glass beads from the
meteorites, the researchers were able to examine the composition of the
beads under a microscope and discover minute amounts of helium and neon
trapped inside. The glass beads themselves were "very small, microscopic
grains," according to Will, measuring only millionths of a meter.
The next stage is to comprehend where Earth's noble gases came from. There
are two basic hypotheses: either Earth physically drew them into its
atmosphere from the cloud of gas and dust that encircled our young sun, or
they were transported by comets and asteroids that smashed into our
protoplanet. Krypton and xenon are two other noble gases that researchers
hope to detect in lunar meteorites to help them answer this question.
Other meteorites that have collided with our planet contain krypton and
xenon, which are fragments of asteroids that may have served as the building
blocks of planets like Earth in the past. If such gases are present in lunar
meteorites as well, we will be able to compare their compositions and "see
the relationship," according to Burgess. Because they provide a more
accurate account of the early history of the solar system, lunar meteorites
should be studied rather than only rocks on Earth.
It would support the hypothesis that our noble gases came from asteroids
and comets if krypton and xenon discovered in lunar meteorites are identical
to those found in meteorites from other places; if not, it would support the
nebula theory. Burgess continues, "It would be a fascinating conundrum that
we'd have to work out" if we don't discover any krypton or xenon.
The researchers found traces of krypton and xenon in the lunar meteorite
samples they examined, according to Henner Busemann from ETH Zurich, a
collaborator on Will's work, but they were unable to confirm their findings.
He states, "We cannot make the case just now. "We'll aim to obtain greater
accuracy now."
We may learn more about the moon's water content if we discover noble gases
there. Water might have survived the moon's tumultuous genesis if hydrogen
and neon did, and there is evidence for this from the water that has frozen
as ice near the moon's poles. Such water could prove to be a priceless asset
for upcoming human missions. The possibility of discovering resources that
humans would wish to exploit increases if the moon is wetter than previously
imagined, according to Burgess.
This may imply that a range of life-forming substances may endure massive
impacts early in a planet's existence. Will adds, "We could develop new
models regarding this planetary formation process in the solar system and
beyond," adding that this may be a factor in the creation of life on Earth
and maybe other worlds as well.